[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: neon transition



On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:56:25AM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >And you completely didn't inform your fellow maintainers about the plan,
> >causing me to do a extra upload of openoffice.org for this (building
> >with internal neon to fix its uninstallability in sid until 2.0.2-1 which
> >can be built against libneon25 and is actually uploading atm).

> Same problem with kdesvn, it will need an extra upload after
> subversion is allowed in sid.

kdesvn doesn't depend on neon.

rapidsvn probably shouldn't either; I imagine cleaning up its unnecessary
library deps will unhook it from this transition.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: