On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:13:58PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: >> There's an ongoing neon 0.24.x to 0.25.x transition in Sid. Most of the >>packages are updated. There are some drawbacks at the moment: >>1) Subversion is hold in the NEW queue since two weeks due to a binary >>package rename. > >OOo will too, but the version not requiring neon (because temporarily >built with internal one is in testing now, so..) > >>2) Thus even if the rapidsvn transition in done, its upload is waiting >>on the new Subversion package. >>3) There's no sense to allow neon to Etch until dependant packages are >>not ready to enter Etch (Subversion is held, rapidsvn waits on it, etc). >>May I ask Vorlon to put the neon Etch transition on hold? > >libneon25 won't enter etch till all dependent packages are rebuilt >because it will break the old, unrebuilt packages when done so. > >>Other packages like davfs2 is told to be ready this week. What about all the other packages involved in this transition? I uploaded rpm and it will wait until neon and all its reverse dependencies are hinted together. libneon24 Reverse Depends: libsvn0 subversion rapidsvn openoffice.org-core libsvn0 librpm4 libneon24-dev kdesvn kdesdk-misc davfs2 tla bazaar libneon24-dev Reverse Depends: libsvn0-dev librpm-dev libsvn0-dev librpm-dev >And you completely didn't inform your fellow maintainers about the plan, >causing me to do a extra upload of openoffice.org for this (building >with internal neon to fix its uninstallability in sid until 2.0.2-1 which >can be built against libneon25 and is actually uploading atm). Same problem with kdesvn, it will need an extra upload after subversion is allowed in sid. Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature