Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > There's an ongoing neon 0.24.x to 0.25.x transition in Sid. Most of the > packages are updated. There are some drawbacks at the moment: > 1) Subversion is hold in the NEW queue since two weeks due to a binary > package rename. OOo will too, but the version not requiring neon (because temporarily built with internal one is in testing now, so..) > 2) Thus even if the rapidsvn transition in done, its upload is waiting > on the new Subversion package. > 3) There's no sense to allow neon to Etch until dependant packages are > not ready to enter Etch (Subversion is held, rapidsvn waits on it, etc). > May I ask Vorlon to put the neon Etch transition on hold? libneon25 won't enter etch till all dependent packages are rebuilt because it will break the old, unrebuilt packages when done so. > Other packages like davfs2 is told to be ready this week. And you completely didn't inform your fellow maintainers about the plan, causing me to do a extra upload of openoffice.org for this (building with internal neon to fix its uninstallability in sid until 2.0.2-1 which can be built against libneon25 and is actually uploading atm). Regards, Rene
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature