[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> [2005-10-24 23:59]:

> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above?  These
> > > packages are not currently in testing.

> > Because they're not in testing, they don't affect whether the other
> > packages can be updated in testing.

> This means that once octave2.1 enters testing, both octaviz and octave-forge
> will be automatically promoted?  Or will a hint be needed?

They'll re-enter testing automatically, as long as they meet the other
criteria for testing propagation at the time (binaries in sync, aged long
enough in unstable).  So unless they're reuploaded in the next couple of
days, they should go in at the same time as the rest.

> > Anyway, it does look like everything's ready to go as soon as rmpi gets
> > built on hppa -- which should happen soon enough now that r-base has
> > successfully built there.

> I am holding my breath...  If you do not want to lose a DD by asphyxiation,
> please, go fast! :-)

rmpi has now built on hppa, so I think we're in really good shape.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: