Re: mpich C++ transition status
* Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-10-24 23:59]:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above? These
> > packages are not currently in testing.
> Because they're not in testing, they don't affect whether the other
> packages can be updated in testing.
This means that once octave2.1 enters testing, both octaviz and octave-forge
will be automatically promoted? Or will a hint be needed?
> Anyway, it does look like everything's ready to go as soon as rmpi gets
> built on hppa -- which should happen soon enough now that r-base has
> successfully built there.
I am holding my breath... If you do not want to lose a DD by asphyxiation,
please, go fast! :-)