[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mpich C++ transition status



On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> [2005-10-11 19:22]:

> > Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration.

> > The following are uploaded, but some have build problems:

> > Source: blacs-mpi
> > Source: hdf5
> > Source: illuminator
> > Source: lam
> > Source: mpb
> > Source: mpich
> > Source: netpipe
> > Source: octave2.1
> > Source: petsc
> > Source: plplot
> > Source: pytables
> > Source: rmpi
> > Source: scalapack
> > Source: semidef-oct
> > Source: tessa
> > Source: xmpi
> > Source: octave-gpc (contrib)
> > Source: parmetis (non-free)

> I guess we are getting quite close now (only rmpi on hppa is blocking now)
> but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above?  These
> packages are not currently in testing.

Because they're not in testing, they don't affect whether the other packages
can be updated in testing.

Anyway, it does look like everything's ready to go as soon as rmpi gets
built on hppa -- which should happen soon enough now that r-base has
successfully built there.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: