Re: Coordinating upload of teTeX-3.0 to unstable
Kurt Roeckx <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> The number of packages build-depending on tetex (directly or indirectly
>> via a build-dep on some conversion tool like debiandoc-sgml) is really
>> big, and we will not be able to check this all by hand.
> Doing just build tests for all those packages is easy, the harder
> part is checking if they actually build correctly.
> I can try to build all those for you if you want, and I'll report
> those where I think that show problems.
That would be great. I think most of the problems will show up in
failed builds, some might result in different filelists (pdf file
generated instead of dvi file, but somehow the build does not fail), a
small number might result in wrong fonts being used.
> And please don't assume that transitions are easy, that's what
> most people think, and yet they all take way more longer than
> they should.
Oh, I guess we'll get some work to do. But I'd rather see it now than
wait even longer.
> PS: 3.0-4 build without problems on amd64.
Good to hear - then 3.0-5 will build, too.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich