Re: release policy changes
Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
> I think you're still too caught up on libstdc++, the library. The library
> is not the C++ ABI, just like how libgcc is not used by all C programs.
> The C++ ABI involves things like how classes are laid out and how function
> names are mangled.
So what we do *not* need here is the idea of a special Build-Depends
to signal this kind of thing. That would be a disaster.
>> If the ABI changes but not the SONAME then the only sane thing to do is
>> to encode the ABI in the package name, e.g. libstc++-6c1002. Just like
>> for any other lib doing the upcoming c++ abi transition.
> We agree on this.
Bingo, me too.