El mar, 16-11-2004 a las 14:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escribió: > Op di, 16-11-2004 te 06:44 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson: > > On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 13:12 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Op di, 16-11-2004 te 12:57 +0100, schreef Martin Schulze: > > > > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > > It is. This is a myth which orignated due to the fact that my > > > > > wanna-build documentation at > > > > > http://people.d.o/~wouter/wanna-build-states used to say wanna-build > > > > > incorporates urgency in its ordering, but I was mistaken. It has been > > > > > fixed in the mean time, but it appears this is a myth which isn't easily > > > > > forgotten > > > > > > > > Just to get this straight, you fixed your documentation, the buildd/wanna-build > > > > handling hasn't been fixed, right? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Because buildd/wanna-build was never broken (in this regards), > > right? > > Depends what you mean by broken ;-) > > Wanna-build never considered a packages' urgency in its ordering. I > thought it did, but was mistaken. I could swear that I have seen packages with urgency high slipping before packages with urgency medium or low in the queue for being built. This happened when "inminent sarge release" was announced ;-) But perhaps I'm also wrong, and the myth hit me. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente