Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable
Op di, 16-11-2004 te 06:44 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 13:12 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op di, 16-11-2004 te 12:57 +0100, schreef Martin Schulze:
> > > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > It is. This is a myth which orignated due to the fact that my
> > > > wanna-build documentation at
> > > > http://people.d.o/~wouter/wanna-build-states used to say wanna-build
> > > > incorporates urgency in its ordering, but I was mistaken. It has been
> > > > fixed in the mean time, but it appears this is a myth which isn't easily
> > > > forgotten
> > >
> > > Just to get this straight, you fixed your documentation, the buildd/wanna-build
> > > handling hasn't been fixed, right?
> > Yes.
> Because buildd/wanna-build was never broken (in this regards),
Depends what you mean by broken ;-)
Wanna-build never considered a packages' urgency in its ordering. I
thought it did, but was mistaken.
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
-- with thanks to fortune