On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:34:33PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > I've got a couple of packages that I really think ought to make it into > sarge but are not making it there because there seems to be no prospect > of them being built by several of the buildds. > One is NIS, where the current version segfaults running ypxfr on PowerPC > (and possibly other architectures). This makes it rather unusable as a > slave on the affected architectures. > The other is Leafnode, where there are useful bugfixes in the current > upstream release including some that could loose data. This is much > less serious (I probably wouldn't mention it except for NIS). > Is there anything I should be doing this situation? Unless the missing builds are caused by build failures, which doesn't seem to be the case here, just hang tight; the freeze will be delayed until legitimate fixes that were uploaded before the original deadline have had a chance to propagate. It would be helpful if you would comment these packages at http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge/ if you haven't already done so. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature