Re: More RC bug work
Roland Bauerschmidt <roland@hbg-bremen.de> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> #260784 ldap-utils
>> This bug appears to have been fixed some time back and the new version
>> has propagated into sarge. I believe that this bug can now be closed.
> No, unfortunately, 2.1.30-3 is not in sarge yet:
> * openldap2 (2.1.30-2 to 2.1.30-3)
> + Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff
> + 7 days old (needed 2 days)
> + Valid candidate
> + Invalidated by dependency
> + Not considered
> + Depends: openldap2 gnutls11 (not considered)
> + Depends: openldap2 gcc-3.4 (not considered)
Was there a particular fix in 2.1.30-3 for this problem? Looking at the
bug, it was reported against 2.1.23-1, and looking at the dependencies in
2.1.30-2 in sarge:
Package: ldap-utils
Priority: optional
Section: net
[...]
Version: 2.1.30-2
[...]
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), [...] libldap2 (= 2.1.30-2)
That tight dependency should, if I'm not mistaken, resolve the original
problem.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: