[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Removal-from-sarge proposals



On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:54:44AM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> >> wmbubble: #207377 (or someone takes the patch and makes an NMU..)

> > Downgrading this; someone seems to have upgraded it without
> > communicating with the maintainer, and there's no real indication in the
> > report that the bug actually has a significant impact on usability, 2.6
> > kernel or not.  Still an NMU candidate, though, IMHO.

> I upgraded this one; I think it deserves "serious" severity since it
> makes wmbubble die after a few seconds with "Floating point exception"
> when running a 2.6 kernel.  As I said in the message to control, I guess
> most users will be running a 2.6 kernel during Sarge's lifetime.

> The solution to this problem is not to NMU with the patch found in
> #207377 but to update the package to version 1.41 which has upstream
> support for Linux 2.6 (not just CPU counters), see #220643.  I had
> several mail exchanges and IRC conversations with the maintainer who
> promised several times to do so, but he seems to have real-life problems
> right now and never got around to doing it.  Note that he didn't
> followup to any of the bugs opened against wmbubble at the moment.

Ok, thanks for the info.  I agree that this bug should be considered RC
then.

Are you yourself planning to NMU the package to the new upstream
version, if the maintainer is not?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: