On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:08:54AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:20:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > I ran out of time around 'l' except for this one I happened to notice: > Some that I spotted the last days (in the "after l" part) > mga-vid: #208358 and #210629 (should perhaps be orphaned, too, but will > give the maintainer a few more days until that) Marked for removal. > netsaint-nrpe: #169333 (but should perhaps removed from unstable as > well, see my mail from today in the br > netsaint-plugins: #198830 (and > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=netsaint-plugins > makes at least one additional RC bugs from what I see). Don't contacted > maintainer yet, though Netsaint is long-dead upstream, and anything that hasn't been updated to use nagios yet should probably also be considered dead (either upstream or wrt Debian). In any case, there are nagios-nrpe packages now from what I see, as well as a nagios-plugins package. Both of these packages should be removed from testing tomorrow. I believe these packages should also be removed from unstable. Does anyone know of a reason why this hasn't been done yet? > wmbubble: #207377 (or someone takes the patch and makes an NMU..) Downgrading this; someone seems to have upgraded it without communicating with the maintainer, and there's no real indication in the report that the bug actually has a significant impact on usability, 2.6 kernel or not. Still an NMU candidate, though, IMHO. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature