Re: Potato revision 1
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:40:02AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
|Pretty much the key goal for potato updates is:
|
| * it shouldn't break *any* working potato systems
|
|That is, there shouldn't be any reason to run r0 instead of r1 or r3
|instead of r8. If there's any risk of things breaking it needs to be
|left for woody where we can spend time getting it widely tested, and fix
|other stuff. Note that unlike the test cycles we don't really have *any*
|possibility for testing updates to potato any more.
How about those documentation only packages, most noticeably the
doc-linux* packages? Most of them are dated January and looks like
they need some updating.
--
Anthony Wong
Reply to: