Previously Michael Schmitz wrote: > Format: 1.5 > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:07:21 +0100 > Source: boot-floppies > Binary: boot-floppies > Architecture: m68k > Version: 2.1.9.2 <---- not a potato version number (slink.r2 perhaps) How would he know that's not a potato version number? I don't see something in there that yells `slink' to me. > Distribution: updates <---- I can't upload to stable, right? You can, and have to. updates is not a valid distribution. > Urgency: low <---- What's appropriate here? low, medium or high. If it's medium or high we'll think a bit longer before ignoring it. > The 'not official release' was to say 'don't worry about the odd version > number; slink boot-floppies for r4 are at 2.1.9.12 but m68k did stop > building boot-floppies at 2.1.9.2, this is just an update with new > kernels'. One line was a bit brief for that ... A bit brief? You have to be clearvoyant to get that.. > I refuse to play this charade any longer. It's not a charade, it's communication. Without good communication things will fall appart. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpU6KuQfxj8H.pgp
Description: PGP signature