On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 11:43:55AM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2004 23:03, Dominique Devriese wrote: > > Achim Bohnet writes: > > > > > My idea now was now to create a kde-options(?) manpage^Wsgml that > > > describes the generic kde and qt options (later maybe in more > > > detail). From all other manpages just use a reference to this > > > manpage. If possible one could even create templates in kdelibs-dev > > > that are included and allow to change these generic parts of each > > > kde manpage at a central place. > > > > > Does this sound reasonable? > > > > It does to me. It's great that you are going to work on the KDE > > program manpages. Especially for command line utilities like dcop*, > > this would be really useful. > > Thx, Ben, Chris, Dominique for the encouraging answers. > I've started last night and created kde-options from kde-config, > augmenting (well cut and paste) it with descriptions from the qt > and kdelibs docs. Then realized, that kdelibs > is LGPL and and I'm not sure if QT GPL is compatible with the > '...with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover Texts.' > addition Chris used in his manpages. > > So it looks like I have to wait a bit and use my own words. Maybe > I also ask some KDE developers for an okay to an LGPL -> GPL > transition when I find much useful material in the kdelibs docs. > Or Chris, in this case would you give your okay to put kde-config > under the LGPL? > > I'm definitly not an good english writer and modifying c&p gives > certainly a better result that me formulating the text. Hmm I didn't even realize it was under GFDL, yea I am going to relicense all mine under LGPL. Thanks for bringing that point up. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature