[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1019380: marked as done (UDD: import ports.d.o data to ports tables instead of derivatives tables)

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2022 09:04:59 +0100
with message-id <Y6ayq4Smb6a89dKl@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#1019380: UDD: import ports.d.o data to ports tables instead of derivatives tables
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019380,
regarding UDD: import ports.d.o data to ports tables instead of derivatives tables
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1019380: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@debian.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>

Currently the unofficial Debian ports archive is imported in UDD tables
named 'derivatives', but these days it is more of a Debian subproject.

The 'derivatives' table also receives (or did in the past) data from
aptosid and skolelinux, which are/were both derivatives of Debian.

Therefore, I would like ports data to be imported into 'ports' tables
instead and make the new ports table available to the UDD madison cgi
and then add the ports UDD madison cgi to the default rmadison URL map.

https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/madison.cgi?table=derivatives

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 24/12/22 at 10:50 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> 
> > 1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased
> > is not shipped. Is that expected?
> 
> This is a long-standing issue with the ports mini-dak setup.
> 
> The source packages are actually present in the archive but
> there are no Sources files referencing them, for example:
> 
> https://deb.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-riscv64/main/g/grpc/
> 
> > 2/ Would you be OK with a set of tables named unofficial_sources,
> > unofficial_packages, etc? Then I would re-use the same set of tables to
> > import janitor's fresh-releases and fresh-snapshots suite.
> 
> The ports are a lot more official than the janitor repos and I don't
> think it is a good idea to mix them both into the same set of tables.
> 
> In addition the main reason I wanted this change is so that porters can
> use `rmadison -u ports` to get just ports package details and not get
> aptosid or other repositories that are not related to ports.
> 
> For these reasons I think we should have separate tables for ports and
> other unofficial repos like the janitor ones.

OK, I imported ports to ports_* tables.
I'm closing this bug, assuming you will track the rmadison change in a
separate one.

Lucas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: