On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > 1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased > is not shipped. Is that expected? This is a long-standing issue with the ports mini-dak setup. The source packages are actually present in the archive but there are no Sources files referencing them, for example: https://deb.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-riscv64/main/g/grpc/ > 2/ Would you be OK with a set of tables named unofficial_sources, > unofficial_packages, etc? Then I would re-use the same set of tables to > import janitor's fresh-releases and fresh-snapshots suite. The ports are a lot more official than the janitor repos and I don't think it is a good idea to mix them both into the same set of tables. In addition the main reason I wanted this change is so that porters can use `rmadison -u ports` to get just ports package details and not get aptosid or other repositories that are not related to ports. For these reasons I think we should have separate tables for ports and other unofficial repos like the janitor ones. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part