[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1019380: UDD: import ports.d.o data to ports tables instead of derivatives tables



On 08/09/22 at 16:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
> X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@debian.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
> 
> Currently the unofficial Debian ports archive is imported in UDD tables
> named 'derivatives', but these days it is more of a Debian subproject.
> 
> The 'derivatives' table also receives (or did in the past) data from
> aptosid and skolelinux, which are/were both derivatives of Debian.
> 
> Therefore, I would like ports data to be imported into 'ports' tables
> instead and make the new ports table available to the UDD madison cgi
> and then add the ports UDD madison cgi to the default rmadison URL map.
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/madison.cgi?table=derivatives

Hi,

That sounds OK in principle. However,

1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased
is not shipped. Is that expected?

2/ Would you be OK with a set of tables named unofficial_sources,
unofficial_packages, etc? Then I would re-use the same set of tables to
import janitor's fresh-releases and fresh-snapshots suite.

Lucas


Reply to: