Hi,
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (2015-07-17 14:36:43)
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > I think for the tracker we would want a custom format, in case the
> > > dose3 raw data format/schema changes.
> >
> > right. I think that makes sense.
>
> I don't see how it makes sense.
sadly I'll not be able to attend all of debconf so let me add another note to
consider here:
Maybe in the future, qa.debian.org/dose could also generate some crossbuild
dependency satisfaction results for some common architecture combinations like
buildarch=amd64 and hostarch={armhf,arm64,mipsel}. In terms of dose3 invocation
that would just be a matter of adding --deb-host-arch as another argument and
the existing way of turning dose3 yaml output into HTML can probably entirely
be kept.
So if it is not too crazy of an idea that qa.debian.org/dose could also
regularly generate crossbuild dependency satisfaction results, then please take
this future possibility into account when thinking about how to export the data
currently generated by qa.debian.org/dose in a machine readable format, so that
later adding of crossbuild results does not break things.
Thanks!
cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature