On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:10:59PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > I've prepared some things to be added to the TODO file, based on the > capabilities of PTS and various things I noticed while auditing the > PTS and tracker code and templates. I'm happy to help work on some of > them as I find time to do so. > > Output: > > … > problems - co-maintainers suggestion for no uploaders && priority > standard/required/important This is actually a problem in both PTS/tracker. The root cause is the Sources file doesn't always provide accurate information (#626394). In order to properly determine the priority of a source package, one would need to find the "highest" priority among, in order of increasing reliability but also, I think, increasing changes to tracker code: - source package's Priority field. This is what's currently used, but under specific conditions it reports "source" instead. - source package's Package-List field. This field may not be present and may not list all binary packages when it is present. - binary package's Priority field. This requires mapping all the binary packages back to the source package and then determining the highest priority among them. Ideally, this is what dak would do when generating the Sources file, since it should have all the necessary information then. > opensearchdescription Isn't this done now? Cheers, -- James GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <jamessan@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature