debian-qa Oct 2012 by subject
![[First Page]](/images/first.png) |
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
![[Last Page]](/images/last.png) |
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Bug#344847: marked as done (thuriaux's scripts & definite MIAs)
Bug#484873: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org: should it still list oldstable?)
Bug#498108: marked as done (qa.debian.org: package with comment-only 'debian/watch' reported as "Error")
Bug#499546: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW
Bug#572243: marked as done ([DEHS] watch file not picked up by DEHS, pkg displayed as having no watch file)
Bug#647894: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DEHS uses watch file from sid (fixed for a branch) for package in experimental (should accept latest))
Bug#657583: marked as done ([packages.qa.debian.org] priority information garbled, shows "source")
Bug#663574: marked as done (PTS: incorrectly reports 'neither part of unstable or experimental')
Bug#667632: marked as done (qa.debian.org: PTS is linking to ftp.debian.net which is out of date)
Bug#670342: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Link to problems with migrating to testing fails with 404)
Bug#679516: PTS .dsc URLs use section from latest upload for all distributions
Bug#681836: marked as done (PTS: link to l10n status should be moved from i18n.debian.net to i18n.debian.org)
Bug#689342: qa.debian.org: incorrectly shows a new upstream version for a native package
Bug#690244: ITP: os-autoinst - cross-distribution-capable, fully automated testing framework
Bug#690245: RFS: zgv/5.9-6 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer
Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases
Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases
Bug#690384: marked as done (DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases)
Bug#690384: moreinfo (DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases)
Bug#690414: PTS: screenshots related improvements
Bug#691849: pts: link to mail archive for maintainer mailing list
collab-qa vs qa alioth groups?
Debian-qa, informācijas avots Tev..
Hacking
Re: Hijacking^W^W^W^W^W^WSalvaging packages for fun and profit: A proposal
Please allow UDD access to pet database on wagner.d.o
Processed: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases
Processed: info provided (#690384)
Processed: PTS: binary package description not shown when package is not in unstable
Processed: PTS .dsc URLs use section from latest upload for all distributions
Processed: PTS: please exclude bugs tagged patch with tag wontfix
Processed: PTS: please link to html policy upgrade checklist
Processed: PTS: please reduce number of confirmation e-mails when subscribing to multiple packages
Processed: PTS: screenshots related improvements
Processed: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW
Processed: Re: Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases
quant.debian.org reject again my messages
Re: Ubuntu Bug Fixing Initiatives
[UDD] Does anybody care about PET VCS import into UDD?
The last update was on 19:19 GMT Wed May 01. There are 71 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc
