This one time, at band camp, Paul Wise said: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Stephen Gran wrote: > > > I see the advantage of having a udd replica set somewhere, if > > latency and read performance on ullmann is problematic. > ... > > postgres has native replication support. I don't see a need to > > reinvent the wheel here, do you? > > For some reason I thought the plan was to split the import host from > the query host(s) and use postgres replication to migrate data from > the import host onto alioth and any other machines using UDD. Am I > misremembering or is that a bad plan for some reason? I think that postgres replication is the best solution for replicating the database, yes. There were a lot of different plans about how to make udd more usable for people, but I think we should give the new host a try and see if we think we still need to do any horizontal scaling work. While I think that most of the scripts running on alioth to query udd should probably find another home, I also realize that the reality is that people will continue to do this sort of thing on alioth, so it does perhaps make sense to have a local replica set there in any event. We'll see how things go over the first few weeks of ullmann going live. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature