[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

On 26/04/09 at 12:00 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:37:04 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Would it be ok to leave it that way? or only mention lintian errors? or only
> > when the same package has serious issues? or only when the same package
> > does *not* have any serious issue? or any combination of those? or should
> > lintian stuff be kept out of these emails?
> IMO inlcuding lintian is a helpful feature but I'd restrict it to
> lintian _E_rrors; and I'd include them in any case, independent of
> other issues a package may or may not have.

I really don't think that we should send emails to maintainers if they
only have lintian errors (no other problems, like RC bugs). If those
lintian errors are so grave, maybe (RC) bugs should be filed?
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: