[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lintian errors/warnings on ddpo-by-mail emails

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:37:04 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:

> Would it be ok to leave it that way? or only mention lintian errors? or only
> when the same package has serious issues? or only when the same package
> does *not* have any serious issue? or any combination of those? or should
> lintian stuff be kept out of these emails?

IMO inlcuding lintian is a helpful feature but I'd restrict it to
lintian _E_rrors; and I'd include them in any case, independent of
other issues a package may or may not have.
 .''`.   Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: