Re: dag2html: a package in need of some love
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:15 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0000, James Westby wrote:
> >
> >> Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
> >> and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate
> >> for removal?
> >>
> >
> > Personally I'm not, though of course I'm in favour of having it in the
> > pkg-ocaml-maint team as it would be a good idea for the sake of
> > uniformity. However this does not solve the lack of manpower problem.
> > Any other taker from d-o-m?
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> Is it even worth it? It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an
> upstream update since 2001?? My vote would be for removal.
I agree, and I haven't seen any interest in picking it up.
Would anyone object to me filing a removal request?
Thanks,
James
Reply to: