Re: dag2html: a package in need of some love

[Barry deFreese <bddebian@comcast.net>]

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:00:16PM +0000, James Westby wrote:
>   
> > Would the pkg-ocaml team be willing to take it over
> > and make it build again? If not is it a valid candidate
> > for removal?
> >     
>
> Personally I'm not, though of course I'm in favour of having it in the
> pkg-ocaml-maint team as it would be a good idea for the sake of
> uniformity. However this does not solve the lack of manpower problem.
> Any other taker from d-o-m?
>
> Cheers.
>   
Is it even worth it?  It's buggy, has a popcon of 12, and hasn't seen an 
upstream update since 2001??  My vote would be for removal.

Apologies for all of the CCs but I'm not sure who is in which lists.

Thanks,

Barry deFreese