Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:20:50 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050715132050.GH19080@mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050715124839.GA31436@edgard.fdn.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20050713213346.GL19080@mathom.us> <[🔎] 20050715124839.GA31436@edgard.fdn.fr>

I don't get it. If a maintainer still needs to review the patch and
upload it, how is this different than the current situation?

Mike Stone

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re:%20Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
  - From: Benjamin BAYART <bayartb@edgard.fdn.fr>

References:
- Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
  - From: Benjamin BAYART <bayartb@edgard.fdn.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
Next by Date: Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
Previous by thread: Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
Next by thread: Re:%20Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread