Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Thomas Schorpp wrote:
yes, i've mailed to this list to find out whats missing, beating me up
for it wont surely help ;)
You're not being beaten up. If you were looking for a different reaction
you should try another forum. This list is basically focused on solving
problems. You have yet to explain what problem you are trying to solve
or how you plan to solve it. If you want a theoretical discussion of ISO
procedures vis-a-vis free software this just isn't the right place.
Mike Stone
Reply to:
- References:
- [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
- From: Thomas Schorpp <t.schorpp@gmx.de>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
- From: Thomas Schorpp <t.schorpp@gmx.de>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
- From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [RFC] Software Process Improvement in Free Software, Closing the Quality Cycle, Inventing Non-Developer-Demotivating QA/QM/SPI]
- From: Thomas Schorpp <t.schorpp@gmx.de>