[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Restoring qa.d.o



On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like
> > to propose the following:
> > 
> > 
> > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in
> > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.  There is a file named
> > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.list which gives the
> > audit status for each file or directory.  Please update that file if you
> > audited something that is still marked UNCHECKED.
> 
> You're editing the file ... and I can't safely update it without
> fearing that you overwrite what I want to change.

Ah, sorry for that.

> Please mark everything below pts/ in CVS head as checked by me.

done.

> The local copy can be removed and it will be restored from the clean

fine.

> CVS, this copy is not the main one since the PTS is running on master. I
> checked the copy on master of course since the service is already
> reenabled.
> 
> The complete ddpo dir in CVS head has also been checked by Igor (igenibel).

done.

> As I understand it, the rest in the local copy of the ddpo are only temp
> files iirc and they could be removed.

I marked all of pts/ and data/ddpo/ as move away and fetch from cvs.


That leaves us with the wml, the bts, wnpp, and mia.  tbm, you did review
those, right?  Did anybody review the CVSROOT?

Peter
-- 
 PGP signed and encrypted  |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
    messages preferred.    | : :' :      The  universal
                           | `. `'      Operating System
 http://www.palfrader.org/ |   `-    http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: