Bug#80573: should replace grafix
Hi Christian!
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 00-12-27 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > So does grafix-dev.
> > >
> > > But that is not fine. No package should contain any files that are in an
> > > other package already. So the correct solution is to put those
> > > conflicting files either in grafix1 or grafix-dev.
>
> > That should be fine as grafix is an old package, not?
>
> Hm, grafix and grafix-dev are old package and grafix1 and grafix1-dev
> are new packages?
no, old package: grafix
new packages: grafix1 and grafix-dev
grafix1 and grafix-dev can be installed together (as it should be)
grafix-dev depends on grafix1
The only problem is that when installing grafix-dev, the old package
"grafix" might still be installed -> file clash. Therefore grafix1
as well as grafix-dev should Conflict: grafix.
> > > > So apt-get dist-upgrade will not catch it and wait until you
> > > > manually install grafix1 or grafix-dev?
> > >
> > > I never used dist-upgrade, so I can't comment on this.
>
> > How do you upgrade?
>
> apt-get upgrade
Will "apt-get upgrade" work if the new package only has
| Replaces: foo
| Conflicts: foo
ioe, will it pick up the new package automatically if the old
one was installed? (it didn't for me although I might have
screwed up)
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted messages preferred.
http://www.palfrader.org/
Reply to: