Bug#80573: should replace grafix
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > grafix1 shares a set of files with grafix.
> That's fine as grafix is an old package.
> > So does grafix-dev.
> But that is not fine. No package should contain any files that are in an
> other package already. So the correct solution is to put those
> conflicting files either in grafix1 or grafix-dev.
That should be fine as grafix is an old package, not?
> > So apt-get dist-upgrade will not catch it and wait until you
> > manually install grafix1 or grafix-dev?
> I never used dist-upgrade, so I can't comment on this.
How do you upgrade?
PGP signed and encrypted messages preferred.