[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Debian Quality Assurance Group



Le Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 12:04:50AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
> Is this written clear enough now? We obviously need a native English
> speaker to read the text and find any wrong/awkward/unusual expressions/words.

It's fine for me but ...

> I'm not really sure... people can get in situations where they can be
> totally unreachable for a week or so, and if we do the NMU too soon,
> they may not get the chance to do it themselves because they didn't
> even get to read the message (when you don't read debian-devel for 10
> days you surely won't notice one message among others). We must
> remember, that this is basically stepping on people's toes as careful
> as possible :)

... you're speaking of debian-devel, I think that the QA member has
to send his intent to NMU to -qa and to the personal email of the
maintainer. The maintainer has two weeks to say, « no please don't, i'll
do it myself » or « go for it and thanks for the help ». If we don't get
any response to a mail sent to him personnaly within 15 days (and that
we don't know that he is absent !), then the QA member should have the
right to make the NMU.

Of course, if the response is no then the QA member don't have the right
to do his NMU before we reached the second limit (30 days).

Cheers,
-- 
Hertzog Raphaël >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://prope.insa-lyon.fr/~rhertzog/


Reply to: