Re: autofs
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:58:17PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Yes, just a fix of my previous QA upload. I'm aware of your
> current activities. Eventually, I'll post patches or comments on BTS. I have
> a working NIS environment here, just if you need a testbed or something.
If you could test and verify the patch for #278229, that would be very good.
> BTW, i did try to subscribe the autofs devel list, without results.
> I think communicating a few patches and comments upstream is mandatory
> for autofs...
Yes, indeed. I don't even know the upstream distribution site (nor how to
subscribe to the list); do you know where it is? :-)
> Also, if i had time, I would start experiments with autofs-ng which
> is potentially a complete rewrote and improvement of current
> kernel and user space tools.
I think I'll leave that for somebody else; my primary intention now is to
clean up the bug list a bit and make sure autofs is in a releasable state for
sarge (which I guess it is, after you fixed all the RC bugs :-) ).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: autofs
- From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>
- References:
- autofs
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Re: autofs
- From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>