On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:54 PM Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
wrote:
Yes, your script counts the dependencies along one direction (rdeps),
identifying which packages are ready to be de-python2-ised next.
I'm talking about dependencies in the opposite direction, deps not
rdeps. Upstream vs downstream.
My question is, of the 844 packages now currently on rdeps=0 and ready
for processing, which one should be processed first? Which one will
free up the largest number of upstream packages? Which one gives the
biggest bang for buck?
gothca, i hope.
I've added the number of forward dependencies in the last update to
the webpage; it's not super-accurate (f.e. python dep is counted
twice, due to the nature of how it's produced, > 2.7 < 2.8) but it
should give a general idea of what you asked for