Re: Adopting OpenStack packages
On 03/05/2017 01:44 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday, March 05, 2017 01:26:19 AM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 03/04/2017 04:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> This was not about isolated mistakes.
>>> [...]
>>> I do not, however, think it's useful to rehash the details.
>>
>> Though that's what you're doing.
>>
>> You don't have a reason to do so, while I do (ie: explain why I would
>> prefer if packages were not moved to the team). And you're here just
>> proving me right.
>>
>>> I do think it is worth mentioning that since he's back in the team
>>> it wasn't without limit.
>>
>> It's unbelievable to read this. None of the admins accepted to tell what
>> would be the limit. Vincent explain how I have been re-added. Hopefully,
>> you're only having difficulties to remember rather than being completely
>> dishonest here.
>>
>> Conclusion of this little thread with Scott: I am right to continue to
>> distrust this team's admins. I would advise anyone who don't know the
>> team for so long to also be very careful as well.
>>
>> That's *not* hilarious, and I'm not amused,
>
> I wasn't at Debconf, so whatever happened there, I wasn't a part of it.
That's not what I just wrote about. I wrote about the fact that, when
you guys decided to ban me, you - and I mean plural you, the admins -
refused to say for how long.
> All I
> know is I was asked to consider re-adding you by one of the other admins and
> we agreed to it.
>
> As far as the rest, we've never even (that I recall/know of) ever discussed
> banning anyone else. This is absolutely not something anyone needs to worry
> about and I'd appreciate you knock off the FUD.
>
> Scott K
If you guys banned me once, in a way that I considered not proportionate
to the miscommunication I did, what assurance do I have that it wont
happen again? I do have the real concern that, if more packages are
moved to the DPMT, I may loose access to them, making it impossible to
package OpenStack in a normal way.
That's no FUD.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: