On Mar 07, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Brian May wrote: >I really like the work flow of git-dpm. Think it is much better then >gbp-pq, which IIRC stores and distributes the patch files in git. > >Shame it isn't better maintained. As a result, seems it is very easy to >get it in a confused state (e.g. by not noticing the local upstream >branch needs a fast forward) and doesn't handle merging of branches. Just to be clear, I agree on all your points. When git-dpm works, it works great and you almost don't even have to think about. I like tools that don't make me think. :) Cheers, -Barry
Attachment:
pgpR2E1kABG7I.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature