* Jordan Metzmeier: " Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy" (Wed, 7 May 2014 21:55:20 -0500): Hello Jordan, > The jurko fork was the one I was working with when attempting the port > to suds. I never made it to testing under python3. [...] > I consider debbugs to be broken, not suds. Thanks for your detailed explanations. Could you share, if you have any experiences with orginal suds compared to suds-furko (or any of the other forks mentionned by Barry)? I don't expect http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/suds/trunk to be revived [1] and of course it would be preferable to have an actively maintained version of suds in Debian. suds-furko seems to be the most appropriate candidate [2]. If no one raises his hands or objects, I will try to do some tests and file the ITP. Cheers, Mathias [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/suds/2013-July/002127.html [2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7739613/python-soap-client-use-suds-or-something-else -- Mathias Behrle PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature