Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy
Am 07.05.2014 17:27, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
>> + <p><enumlist>
>> + <item>
>> + <p>
>> + Applications should use Python3, and should not be
>> + packaged for Python2 as well.
>> + </p>
>
> Maybe also that system scripts written in Python should be Python 3 and not
> Python 2. I'd add the clarity just because I'm not sure folks think of such
> system scripts as "applications".
proposing a separate item.
<p>
Command line scripts, packaging tools, tools used by
Debian outside the archive, etc. should use Python3, and
should not be packaged for Python2.
</p>
>> + </item>
>> + <item>
>> + <p>
>> + Python libraries should be always packaged for Python3
>> + if supported. Python2 libraries should be packaged, if
>> + applications dound in the reverse dependencies are not
>
> s/dound/found/
fixed.
Reply to: