Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions

To: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
From: Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@logilab.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:58:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20120716155806.GF7089@crater1.logilab.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1347516.j6B7HhzdZl@scott-latitude-e6320>
References: <[🔎] 87d343rkhe.fsf@liska.ath.cx> <[🔎] 2045675.bODldYHci7@scott-latitude-e6320> <[🔎] 20120716150659.GD21226@onerussian.com> <[🔎] 1347516.j6B7HhzdZl@scott-latitude-e6320>

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:37:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> I think at least suggests, but I think recommends is better if it doesn't 
> behave as a dependency loop.  I haven't looked into how this gets handled yet.  
> Anyone?
> 
Recommends should be fine AFAIK, since they don't impose any
unpack/configuration ordering on the package manager.

Cheers,
Julien
-- 
Julien Cristau          <julien.cristau@logilab.fr>
Logilab		        http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances

Reply to:

References:
- dh_python2 and large /usr/share/pyshared
  - From: debian-devel@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher)
- Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
  - From: Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@dartmouth.edu>
- Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
Next by Date: Re: packaging under SVN and branching (unstable/experimental)
Previous by thread: Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
Next by thread: Re: suffix for packages with (optional?) Python extensions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread