On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:18 +0200, Nicolas Chauvat wrote: > If and only if you were to consider replacing SCons, take a look at > waf that has many qualities. http://code.google.com/p/waf/ Please do not look at waf, it is worse than scons, which is why it was removed from Debian. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part