Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > doko uploaded the new policy in python-defaults, so we can consider this > edition complete. Certainly it's not perfect and I'll be keeping an eye on > bug submissions. > > I've also been added to uploaders for python-defaults and will continue to > work on this. Thanks for that, to all involved parties. I'd like to refresh [1] too, it currently states policy is not up-to-date, together with some other inaccuracies. Also, what to do with [2]? This is nor the new policy, nor the "best practice" nowadays, what about renaming it to avoid misunderstandings? > I know a lot of effort has been made to get the archive ready for Python 2.6. > Either before or with the Python 2.6 upload, we are going to have to drop > Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. Any work that could be done now to > ease that transition would be beneficial. We moved towards completing Python 2.6 transition bugs [3], now only a few of them are still open. Many py2.6-isms are yet to come, though. I believe defining a roadmap for the days to come would be appreciated, so interested parties can start to work on issues raised and help Matthias to perform the transition. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy [3] http://tiny.pl/hqwjz Regards, -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org> `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature