debian-python Dec 2009 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Bug#559237: python-asterisk: FTBFS with Python2.6
Bernd Zeimetz
Request to join the team
Muflone
Re: Request to join the team
Piotr Ożarowski
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Request to join the team
Muflone
python-sip4 should be updated
Ville M. Vainio
docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH
Simon McVittie
Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH
Ben Finney
Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH
Simon McVittie
Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH
Jakub Wilk
Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH
Michael Schutte
RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Jakub Wilk
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Jakub Wilk
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Cyril Brulebois
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Luca Falavigna
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Ben Finney
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Luca Falavigna
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Steve Langasek
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Loïc Minier
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Kumar Appaiah
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
anatoly techtonik
Re: RFC: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices
Josselin Mouette
Recursive dependencies on pythonX.Y-foo practices
Loïc Minier
Re: Recursive dependencies on pythonX.Y-foo practices
Scott Kitterman
RFS: wixi
Elías Alejandro
RFS:wixi
Elías Alejandro
Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Scott Kitterman
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
anatoly techtonik
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Ben Finney
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
anatoly techtonik
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Ben Finney
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
anatoly techtonik
Move GPL discussion elsewhere (was: Python Policy)
W. Martin Borgert
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Bastian Venthur
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Omer Zak
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Bastian Venthur
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Adam
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
anatoly techtonik
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Christoph Egger
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
anatoly techtonik
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Piotr Ożarowski
Re: Final updates for this Python Policy revision
Scott Kitterman
Resent: Proposed updates to the Python Policy to reflect current practices -- v2
Loïc Minier
Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle
John Paulett
Re: Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle
Jan Dittberner
Re: Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle
John Paulett
Python Policy Update
Scott Kitterman
Re: Python Policy Update
Sandro Tosi
Re: Python Policy Update
Luca Falavigna
Request for membership in python-modules team (was Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle)
John Paulett
Re: Request for membership in python-modules team (was Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle)
Piotr Ożarowski
Python Bindings for MLT
Jonathan Thomas
Re: Python Bindings for MLT
Jakub Wilk
Re: Python Bindings for MLT
Jonathan Thomas
Re: Python Bindings for MLT
Jonathan Thomas
Re: Python Bindings for MLT
Jonathan Thomas
[MBF] Handling python2.4 removal
Luca Falavigna
Re: [MBF] Handling python2.4 removal
Luca Falavigna
Re: [MBF] Handling python2.4 removal
Luk Claes
PyGTK and Python 2.6
David D Lowe
Re: PyGTK and Python 2.6
Kumar Appaiah
Re: PyGTK and Python 2.6
Scott Kitterman
Re: PyGTK and Python 2.6
Josselin Mouette
Re: PyGTK and Python 2.6
Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Bug#561479: RM: docutils-writer-manpage -- uninstallable, integrated into new python-docutils
Simon McVittie
Bug#561478: RM: odtwriter -- uninstallable, integrated into new python-docutils
Simon McVittie
Advice: how to effectively maintain pyparted in Debian?
Luca Falavigna
Re: Advice: how to effectively maintain pyparted in Debian?
Paul Wise
Re: Advice: how to effectively maintain pyparted in Debian?
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Request to join the Python Modules Packaging Team
Christopher Albert
Re: Request to join the Python Modules Packaging Team
Sandro Tosi
Re: Request to join the Python Modules Packaging Team
Piotr Ożarowski
RFS: kabikaboo (new package)
Jeremy Bicha
Unit tests
anatoly techtonik
Re: Unit tests
W. Martin Borgert
Re: Unit tests
anatoly techtonik
Re: Unit tests
W. Martin Borgert
Re: Unit tests
Guy Hulbert
Re: Unit tests
Sandro Tosi
Re: Unit tests
Ben Finney
Re: Unit tests
anatoly techtonik
jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
Paul Wise
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
Paul Wise
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
Guy Hulbert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
anatoly techtonik
Trac upgrade documentation (was: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11)
W. Martin Borgert
Re: Trac upgrade documentation (was: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11)
anatoly techtonik
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be < 1.3
W. Martin Borgert
Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages
Ben Finney
Re: Python-Soya: About serious problems of soya when compiled with latest pyrex
Vincent Bernat
Trac wrong plugin names.
anatoly techtonik
Re: Trac wrong plugin names.
Christoph Egger
Bug#562904: adonthell ftbfs on armel
peter green
How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
anatoly techtonik
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
W. Martin Borgert
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
anatoly techtonik
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
Iustin Pop
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
anatoly techtonik
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
Ben Finney
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
Josselin Mouette
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
anatoly techtonik
Debian packaging documentation for Python packages (was: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?)
Ben Finney
Re: How do I know if my package is 'arch-all' or 'arch-any'?
Josselin Mouette
The last update was on 15:23 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 130 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc