Re: what to do about python-kjbuckets

[Joel Rosdahl <joel@debian.org>]

Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> writes:

> I would hope that you also make a python1.5-kjbuckets so that older
> python1.5 programs that used it can still use it. You them also make
> a python2.2-kjbuckets (2.2.0-port.20011104) package if you want
> something newer.
> 
> If you want to support the default python, you need a
> python2.1-kjbuckets and an empty python-kjbuckets package that has
> "Depends: python (>=2.1), python (<<2.2), python2.1-kjbuckets". Or
> you could wait untill 2.2 becomes the default python...

python-kjbuckets, python2.1-kjbuckets and python2.2-kjbuckets are now
in incoming.  (Same for python*-egenix-*; I've built python2.2-*
versions too.)

As Matthias Klose said, do we really need python1.5 versions of
kjbuckets (or python-egenix-*, for that matter)?  Just say the word
and I'll package them.  :-)

        Regards,
        Joel

-- 
Joel Rosdahl <joel@debian.org>   (PGP and GPG keys available)