Dear Donald, Thanks to update the article. I am very sorry for my impudent attitude. But, your latest commit [1] reverted most of modification by Raphael [2]. Is this an intended revert? I am asking, since I do not think that current article states the fact [3] and since the difference between your second latest commit and latest commit shows that the paragraph with important mistake (first half of the article) is not modified [4]. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/publicity/dpn.git/commit/?id=00ed4b680ab0fad016526693e20ee22dc2d27c10 [2] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/publicity/dpn.git/commit/?id=4a45f136fc85a3bce52424d937ec68599a8baeca [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/2016/05/msg00029.html [4] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/publicity/dpn.git/diff/?id=bc118fa6544a3778e368f00d84300a51a061bd50&id2=00ed4b680ab0fad016526693e20ee22dc2d27c10 If you think my attitude is too rude, Please say so. I would clean up my behavior. Sincerely yours, Ryuunosuke Ayanokouzi -- AYANOKOUZI, Ryuunosuke <i38w7i3@yahoo.co.jp>
Attachment:
pgpeW49bOvws5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature