[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Summary] Discourse for Debian



The thread about Discourse is getting too long (both in user and project 
lists) and a lot of people's reactions start to repeat.

So I just wanted to summarize so far everything that people have stated so far 
in a concise manner, and I invite everyone to complete this pros/cons list.
(items are in no particular order)

pros:
=====
- easier moderation (for moderators)
- attracts people who are not comfortable with email
- easier +1 for polls
- easier to split threads
- search function returns relevant results
- ability to close threads
- auto-summarize feature
- supposed to attract younger audience 


cons:
=====

usability:
----------
- does not work offline
- does not work without graphical environment
- does not really work outside of the web browser
- does not work work without javascript
- Not 100% GPL - some javascript scripts loaded into users browser are not 
free
- moderation abilities exclusively tied to web interface
- makes it harder to use for people with limited abilities
- makes it harder to use on weak or non-mainstream hardware that can't run 
modern web-browser
- email integration is second-class, including poor support for quoting
- requires login
- hard to enter long texts due to imperfect web interface
- achievements/badges/other gamification of the process
- increased context switching (instead of all mail from many projects in one 
inbox need to visit multiple different websites and your email mailbox anyway)
- trust levels are revoked if you don't use web interface often enough to 
maintain current trust level
- learning curve exists and so it forces existing users to learn new tool

privacy:
--------
- tracks user activity (including time spent on each page/topic)
- currently no way to request removal of collected user's data
- "trust levels" are earned by spending time on the website and increasing 
post counts allow gaining moderation capabilities
- distributed moderation based on trust levels (amplified by points below)
- moderation possibilities allow editing messages of others
- 1-to-1 messages are not really private (with email it is direct mta-to-mta 
vs discourse still is a middleman)
- moderation audit log is supposed to be present by I have not found it.
- "ease of moderation" is not received positively by end users



why yet another tool/service?
-----------------------------
- yet another service splits the community
- there is already http://forums.debian.net
- there is already  https://reddit.com/r/debian 
- similar efforts have failed int the past due to lack of interest to web 
browser services (shapado.debian.net / ask.debian.net)




I want to leave this as is without final verdict. Everyone should make their 
own.


-- 
Ihor Antonov
https://useplaintext.email



Reply to: