On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:44:09 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > On 2020/02/18 21:15, Daniel Lange wrote: > >> […] I think the current DebConf committee > >> should strongly consider […] > >> keep the bid decision public as it was in prior DebConfs. > > We held public review meetings for the DC21 bids. You did not care to > > show up for either of them. > That's good, the desire to have it public does not equate to a desire or > need for me to be there. IMO it's just important that this doesn't > happen behind closed doors again like last time. AFAICS the process for DC20 and DC21 seems to be the same: - public review meetings for the bids - a private decision meeting of the committee I'd be happy to learn that my impression about the planned procedure for the DC21 decision is wrong, I might easily have missed something. Personally I much prefer public decisions. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Peter Ratzenbeck: Frosty & Cold
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature