Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:07:51 +0200, Philip Hands writes:
>You may be responding on behalf of people who turn out not to exist.
well, i do exist. i have a few packages that aren't vc'd, and i don't see
any need to change that. while i don't mind git, but i'd hate to be _forced_
to use salsa and gbp.
so, why isn't it enough to recommend those things?
as long as the resulting package aupload conforms to the specs i see no
need to bring out the big bludgeon of policy to silence the
minority packagers/old farts whose packages are older than 10y/people who don't like salsa.
regards
az
--
Alexander Zangerl + GPG Key 2FCCF66BB963BD5F + http://snafu.priv.at/
Fachbegriffe der Informatik, 99.9%: Lüge. -- Uwe Ohse
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
Reply to:
- References:
- GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info>
- Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Norbert Preining <norbert@preining.info>
- Re: GR proposal: mandating VcsGit and VcsBrowser for all packages, using the "gbp patches unapplied" layout, and maybe also mandating hosted on Salsa
- From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>