❦ 23 juillet 2019 19:05 +01, Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>:
>>3- Mandating using Salsa as a Git repository.
>>
>>I do believe #1 will pass easily, but that it's useless without #2, and
>>there is some kind of uncertainty. For #3, I'm not even sure we should
>>vote for that, I probably even prefer it not to be voted for myself,
>>though what's annoying me is having to pull some packaging from non-free
>>services such as Github, and this would make an end to it.
>
> There are genuinely good reasons for *not* using salsa. If the debian
> packaging is directly included as part of the upstream git repo(s)
> somewhere else, for example. It's a good thing to encourage salsa
> usage (and I agree 100% with that for most things), but let's not
> argue about making things mandatory please.
git being distributed, you can still push to Salsa too. I don't know the
first thing about Fedora, but they have everything in one place [0] and
I can take a look, browse through history, it seems I can contribute
with just a PR and all packages have the CI plugged in.
[0]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/
--
Use library functions.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature